The Power4Kids first-year report presents impacts on reading achievement at the end of the intervention year, with nearly 800 children in the study¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2009: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The report describes implementation of the interventions and presents end-of-year impacts on reading achievement for a study population of nearly 800 children. → Joseph Torgesen 2006
Evidence¶
Joseph Torgesen 2006¶
Joseph Torgesen, David Myers, Allen Schirm, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Sonya Vartivarian, Wendy Mansfield, Fran Stancavage, Donna Durno, Rosanne Javorsky, Cinthia Haan. (2006). Closing the Reading Gap: First Year Findings from a Randomized Trial of Four Reading Interventions for Striving Readers. Washington, DC: Corporation for the Advancement of Policy Evaluation. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/closing-the-reading-gap-first-year-findings-from-a-randomized-trial-of-four-reading-interventions-for-striving-readers
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Statement of scope from the report overview. The report states it "presents impacts on reading achievement at the end of the intervention year" and that "Nearly 800 children are included in the study." No impact estimates or effect sizes are printed in this summary.
"This report describes the implementation of the interventions and presents impacts on reading achievement at the end of the intervention year."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The four Power4Kids interventions delivered about 100 hours of pull-out instruction in small groups of three students over one school year — related
- The Power4Kids evaluation used two-level random assignment: 50 schools to four interventions and struggling readers within schools to treatment or control — related
- The Power4Kids evaluation covered four widely used reading programs for elementary students with reading problems: Corrective Reading, Failure Free Reading, Spell Read P.A.T., and Wilson Reading — related
- Failure Free Reading, the only word-level-plus-comprehension program, showed impacts for third graders but no impacts for fifth graders — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Four remedial reading interventions combined improved phonemic decoding, word reading accuracy and fluency, and reading comprehension for third-grade struggling readers one year after the interventions ended, though not on all measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
power4kids-first-year-reading-achievement-impacts |
title |
The Power4Kids first-year report presents impacts on reading achievement at the end of the intervention year, with nearly 800 children in the study |
description |
The Power4Kids first-year report presents impacts on reading achievement at the end of the intervention year, with nearly 800 children in the study |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
recheck_by |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — joseph-torgesen-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.