Claims

At-risk grade 2 students taught word problems with the Problem Patterns approach scored significantly higher on the posttest than control students taught traditionally

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Grade 2 experimental students had a lower pretest mean but a significantly higher posttest mean than control students (p < 0.05). → Amiripour 2017

Evidence

Amiripour 2017

Amiripour, P., Dossey, J.A., & Shahvarani, A. (2017). Using a new schema approach with primary at-risk students in word problem solving. REDIMAT, 6(3), 228-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2612

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent samples t-test on grade 2 posttest scores (experimental n = 15, control n = 20), with Levene's test confirming equal variances. The article reports "a significant difference (p asymptotically equal to 0.000)" in posttest means; no effect size is printed.

"Table 5 shows that at the grade 2 level, the results showed that a significant difference (p asymptotically equal to 0.000) existed in the means of the grade 2 posttest scores, where there was no significant difference in the means of the pretest scores between the groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.