Claims

Effects on healthcare utilisation were inconsistent: TERM training showed no effects on visits or medication, while speciAL reduced visits significantly in the intervention group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? TERM training had no effects on how often patients visited their healthcare practitioner or volume of medication consumed, whereas the speciAL training was associated with a significant reduction in patient visits in the intervention group and reduced antidepressant use significant at 6 months. → Thursby Stacie 2024

Evidence

Thursby Stacie 2024

Thursby Stacie, Dismore Lorelle, Swainston Katherine. (2024). Clinical skills development for healthcare practitioners working with patients with persistent physical symptoms (PPS) in healthcare settings: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05306-4

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of healthcare utilisation outcomes: the review reports TERM (Morriss et al., 2007) showed no effects on visit frequency or medication volume, while Schaefert et al. (2013) reported significantly reduced visits in the intervention group and antidepressant use significant at 6 months only.

"Morriss et al. [32] reported that the TERM training had no effects on how often patients visited their healthcare practitioner or volume of medication consumed."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.