Claims

Ninth graders taught pre-vocational education with practical presentations achieved higher post-test scores than peers taught by lecturing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After adjusting for pre-test scores, the experimental group taught with practical presentations significantly outperformed the lecturing control group on the post achievement test. → Haroon M. Al Tawarah 2017

Evidence

Haroon M. Al Tawarah 2017

Haroon M. Al Tawarah, Omar M. Mahasneh & Nourah A. Al-Hawartheh. (2017). The Effect of Practical Presentations' Strategy on the Achievement of the Ninth Graders Students of the Pre-Vocational Education Subject in Shobak District Schools. International Education Studies, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p109

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 92 ninth graders in four Shobak district schools (46 experimental, 46 control) studying sanitation and environment waste recycling units; ANCOVA on post-test scores. The article reports "The accounted value (F) was (4.226)" as significant at α ≤ 0.05 in favor of the experimental group; no effect size is printed.

"The accounted value (F) was (4.226). Which mean s that there are differences with statistical significance between the M eans of the study group students degrees who witnessed the teaching program based on the practical presentations?"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.