Claims

Practice curves in computation and reasoning would resemble the learning curves of Bryan and Harter and Book

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 1913 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Practice curves in both computation and reasoning would not differ materially from the learning curves of Bryan and Harter and Book. → Locke 1913

Evidence

Locke 1913

Locke, L. L. (1913). Inspector Winch's experiments on transfer. https://www.google.com/books/search?q=%22Inspector+Winch%27s+Experiments+on+Transfer%22

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Theoretical argument in a commentary on Winch's experiment, not a measured result. The author assumes practice curves in computation and reasoning 'would not differ materially from the learning curves' of Bryan and Harter and Book.

"It is probably not unfair to assume that practice curves in both computation and reasoning would not differ materially from the learning curves of Bryan and Harter, Book et al."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id practice-curves-computation-reasoning-bryan-harter
title Practice curves in computation and reasoning would resemble the learning curves of Bryan and Harter and Book
description Practice curves in computation and reasoning would resemble the learning curves of Bryan and Harter and Book
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1913
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — locke-1913

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.