Practice frequency, not cumulative usage time, was strongly associated with posttest presentation performance after controlling for baseline and demographics¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In a multiple regression on posttest Overall Rating (N = 204), usage frequency showed a strong positive association (β = .90, p < .001) while cumulative usage time did not reach conventional significance (β = −.11, p = .066). → Hung-Yue Suen and Kuo-En Hung 2026
Evidence¶
Hung-Yue Suen and Kuo-En Hung 2026¶
Hung-Yue Suen and Kuo-En Hung. (2026). An Interpretable Closed-Loop Intelligent Tutoring System for Multimodal Affective Feedback in Asynchronous Presentation Training. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2026.3693864
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Multiple regression with posttest Overall Rating as outcome, pretest rating, two log-based practice indicators, and six demographic covariates as predictors; the model was significant, F(9, 194) = 37.72, p < .001, with "usage frequency showed a strong positive association (β = .90, p < .001)".
"The model was statistically significant, F(9, 194) = 37.72, p < .001, explaining 63.6% of the variance in posttest scores (adjusted R² = .62). Pretest performance remained a reliable predictor (β = .16, p = .002), and usage frequency showed a strong positive association (β = .90, p < .001)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Acceptance scores are broadly held across learner characteristics, with frequency of use the only significant and weak predictor — related
- Among Chinese higher vocational students, GenAI usage habits and usage contexts are positively associated with perceived learning outcomes while usage frequency is negatively associated, controlling for gender and grade — reports the opposite
- Adult learners using the closed-loop ITS improved significantly across all seven BARS presentation dimensions over a 30-day practice window (Cohen's d = 0.39–0.90) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
practice-frequency-predicts-posttest-performance |
title |
Practice frequency, not cumulative usage time, was strongly associated with posttest presentation performance after controlling for baseline and demographics |
description |
Practice frequency, not cumulative usage time, was strongly associated with posttest presentation performance after controlling for baseline and demographics |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hung-yue-suen-and-kuo-en-hung-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.