Teachers perceived 'practised enough' learners to be less accurately placed than learners in the other two Grouped Dashboard categories¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The 'practised enough' group had significantly fewer 'yes' ratings than the 'need more practice' group, and significantly more 'no' ratings than both the 'keep going' and 'need more practice' groups. → Sun 2026

Evidence¶

Sun 2026¶

Sun, C., Major, L., Daltry, R., Obradovic, L., & Friedberg, A. (2026). Enhancing literacy and numeracy through teacher dashboards and digital personalised learning: an A/B/C test in Kenyan early years education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10703-1

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Chi-square analysis of the independence of rating types and the three learner groupings within the Grouped Dashboard partition. Learners in the 'practised enough' category were perceived as less accurately placed than those in the other two categories.

"The “practised enough” group had significantly fewer “yes” ratings than the “need more practice” group (χ 2 (1, N = 5,325) = 8.96, p =.02). Also, the “practised enough” group had significantly more “no” ratings than the “keep going” group (χ 2 (1, N = 2,525) = 17.48, p <.001) and “need more practice” group (χ 2 (1, N = 2,694) = 20.73, p <.001)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The Grouped Dashboard partition scored significantly higher on two literacy test units, with no significant differences on the other seven units including all numeracy tests — related
• Teachers rated the Grouped Dashboard as less accurate than the List Dashboard, providing significantly fewer 'yes' and more 'no' accuracy ratings — related
• Teachers rated literacy rankings as more accurate than numeracy rankings — related