Claims

Science lessons built on students' meaningful pre-inquiries produce higher total science process skills than traditional textbook lessons in 6th-grade classes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The pre-inquiry experimental group outscored the control group on total science process skills at posttest (17.70 vs 16.20, p <.05). → Kang and Noh 2017

Evidence

Kang and Noh 2017

Houn Tae Kang, Suk Goo Noh. (2017). The Effect on Elementary Science Education Based on Student's Pre-inquiry. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(9). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050908

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with one 6th-grade experimental class (33 students) taught via meaningful pre-inquiries and one control class (29 students) taught by general textbook methods in two South Korean elementary schools. Posttest t-test showed the experimental group "showed a significant difference ( p <.05)" on total science process skills.

"Overall, in the case of science process skills, the controlled group showed 16.20 points and the experimental group showed 17.70 points. The experimental group showed a significant difference ( p <.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.