The authors report no significant difference between groups in science and anxiety after pre-inquiry lessons¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The science and anxiety subelement of the affective domain did not differ significantly between the experimental and control groups. → Kang and Noh 2017
Evidence¶
Kang and Noh 2017¶
Houn Tae Kang, Suk Goo Noh. (2017). The Effect on Elementary Science Education Based on Student's Pre-inquiry. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(9). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050908
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Null finding from the interest-in-science posttest comparison in the two-class quasi-experiment: the article states "there was no significant difference in the science and anxiety" (Table 5 reports 3.65 vs 3.56, p = 0.63). Equivalence was not tested.
"Interest in science- related job was also high after the experim ent, and there was no significant difference in the science and anxiety."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Pre-inquiry lessons raised interest in science and its subelements, with no significant difference in science and anxiety — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The pre-inquiry class produced higher overall science-related affective domain scores than the control class — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.