Claims

The Pre-K Mathematics intervention produces greater math knowledge gains in 4-year-olds than business-as-usual control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? 4-year-olds who received Pre-K Mathematics (I-2 and I-1 conditions) showed greater gains in the pre-K year than control children (C condition), on the CMA (ES=1.08) and TEMA-3 (ES=.59). → Starkey et al. 2013

Evidence

Starkey et al. 2013

Prentice Starkey, Alice Klein, & Lydia DeFlorio. (2013). Changing the Developmental Trajectory in Early Math Through a Two-Year Preschool Math Intervention. SREE Fall 2013 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563068

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Cluster-randomized comparison of treatment (I-2 and I-1) versus control 4-year-olds in Head Start classrooms, assessed on the CMA and TEMA-3; printed effect sizes were "ES=1.08" and "ES=.59".

"It was found that greater gains in math knowledge were experienced by 4-year-old treatment children (I-2 and I-1 conditions) in the pre-K year than by 4-year-olds who did not receive this intervention (C condition). This was found both on the CMA (ES=1.08) and the TEMA-3 (ES=.59)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.