Claims

Preservice agricultural teachers were efficacious in personal mathematics and personal teaching efficacy but only moderately efficacious in mathematics teaching efficacy throughout the course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across all three data collection points, participants were moderately efficacious in mathematics teaching efficacy and efficacious in personal mathematics efficacy and personal teaching efficacy. → Christopher T. Stripling and T. Grady Roberts 2013

Evidence

Christopher T. Stripling and T. Grady Roberts 2013

Christopher T. Stripling and T. Grady Roberts. (2013). Effects of Mathematics Integration in a Teaching Methods Course on Self-Efficacy of Preservice Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.02114

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive finding from the three-wave administration of the Mathematics Enhancement Teaching Efficacy Instrument (weeks 1, 12, and 15) to 19 preservice agricultural education teachers (16 females, 3 males, mean age 21.5).

"Participants were moderately efficacious i n mathematics teaching efficacy and efficacious in personal mathematics efficacy and personal teaching efficacy at all three data collection point s."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.