Claims

Preservice teachers report higher self-efficacy for inclusive education than in-service teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Self-efficacy beliefs about implementing inclusive education were higher for preservice (M = 3.69) than for in-service teachers (M = 3.13). → Dignath 2022

Evidence

Dignath 2022

Dignath, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S., van Ewijk, R., & Kunter, M. (2022). Teachers' Beliefs About Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs: a Meta-analytical Study. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of standardized mean scores for self-efficacy (31 estimates from 24 studies) comparing teachers by point in career. The synthesis reports "Self-efficacy beliefs were higher for preservice (M = 3.69) than for in-service teachers (M = 3.13)"; no effect size is printed for this contrast.

"Self-efficacy beliefs were higher for preservice (M = 3.69) than for in-service teachers (M = 3.13)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id preservice-higher-self-efficacy-inclusion-than-inservice
title Preservice teachers report higher self-efficacy for inclusive education than in-service teachers
description Preservice teachers report higher self-efficacy for inclusive education than in-service teachers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dignath-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.