Claims

Preservice elementary teachers reported limited and distorted perceptions of geometry, exemplified by 2-D-only examples and an algebra-dominated view of mathematics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Participants gave only 2-D shapes as geometry examples, omitted transformations, and perceived mathematics as algebraic topics, reflecting limited K-12 geometry experiences. → Fatma Aslan-Tutak and Thomasenia Lott Adams 2015

Evidence

Fatma Aslan-Tutak and Thomasenia Lott Adams 2015

Fatma Aslan-Tutak and Thomasenia Lott Adams. (2015). A Study of Geometry Content Knowledge of Elementary Preservice Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 301-318. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068059

q1 · i? · qualitative · r2

Thematic analysis of interview data from the three participants found their "limited experiences with geometry resulted in distorted perception of geometry"; all reported only one high school geometry course and dissatisfaction with it.

"Indeed, the participants gave only 2-D shapes rather than 3 -D shapes as examples. For example Christiana thought 3 -D geometry as an advanced topic. Some other important topics of geometry such as transformation were not mentioned by any of the participants."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.