In the pre-study, dyads using the DDR script were far more likely to integrate their partner's evidence into their answers on the main topic question¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q1·i3large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? At t1 the odds of incorporating the partner's evidence into answers on the pirate-status question were 10.80 times higher for DDR dyads, χ²(1, N = 28) = 7.34, p = .007; the conviction question showed no relevant differences. → Heimbuch 2018
q1 i3 In the pre-study, the DDR group's overall knowledge-test score was moderately higher than the BRD group's (r = .44). → Heimbuch 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Heimbuch 2018¶
Heimbuch, S., Ollesch, L., & Bodemer, D. (2018). Comparing effects of two collaboration scripts on learning activities for wiki-based environments. University of Duisburg-Essen. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9283-0
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Small laboratory pre-study (N = 28 at t1, N = 22 at t2): DDR vs BRD dyads categorised on whether open-ended answers integrated only own material (A or B) or the partner's evidence (A and B). The t1 χ²(1, N = 28) = 7.34, p = .007 supports the main-topic contrast; no standardized effect size is printed.
"The odds of incorporating evidence from the partner’s learning material into one’s own answer was 10.80 times higher at t1 and 4.08 times higher at t2 if students collaborated with the DDR script (cf. Figure 5)."
Heimbuch 2018 (2)¶
Heimbuch, S., Ollesch, L., & Bodemer, D. (2018). Comparing effects of two collaboration scripts on learning activities for wiki-based environments. University of Duisburg-Essen. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9283-0
q1 · i3 · causal · r1
Pre-study Mann-Whitney comparison of the overall knowledge-test scores (Table 3): BRD M = 23.67 vs DDR M = 25.54, U = 32.50, p = .043, r = .44 [-.06, .72], with the article noting low statistical precision due to the small sample.
"Overall, participants in the BRD group scored two points lower compared to the DDR group (cf. Table 3)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the main study, the DDR script induced far more talk-page discussion contributions and fewer article edits than the BRD script — related
- Wikipedia's bold-edit collaboration script led to lower article quality than a discussion-first alternative script — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
prestudy-ddr-perspective-integration |
title |
In the pre-study, dyads using the DDR script were far more likely to integrate their partner's evidence into their answers on the main topic question |
description |
In the pre-study, dyads using the DDR script were far more likely to integrate their partner's evidence into their answers on the main topic question |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — heimbuch-2018, heimbuch-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.