Pre-test score differences do not explain the cross-cultural differences in effective help-seeking behaviors¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? When models predicted post-test rather than gain, pretest was not selected as a predictor in any of the four datasets, and student behaviors remained in the models. → Amy Ogan 2015

Evidence¶

Amy Ogan 2015¶

Amy Ogan, Erin Walker, Ryan Baker, Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo, Jose Carlo Soriano, Maynor Jimenez Castro. (2015). Towards Understanding How to Assess Help-Seeking Behavior Across Cultures. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Control analysis re-running forward selection to predict post-test scores with pretest available as a predictor; a null result with no effect size printed. The article concludes student behaviors seem better than pretest scores at predicting posttest scores.

"pretest was not selected by forward selection as a predictor of posttest scores in any of the four data sets, and student behaviors did not disappear from the models when pretest scores were included as possible predictors."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Prior Knowledge — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Help abuse is negatively associated with learning in both the Philippines and United States datasets — related
• Within-session help-seeking development predicts unaided post-test performance beyond pre-test performance and static AI-use features — related
• Help-seeking models transfer above chance across sites but perform poorly on the Costa Rican data — related