Claims

The experimental and control groups were equivalent on all four environmental literacy dimensions at pre-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Independent samples t-tests showed no statistically significant pre-test differences between control and experimental groups on environmental knowledge, attitudes, uses, or concern. → Derman et al. 2016

Evidence

Derman et al. 2016

Aysegul Derman, Elvan Sahin, Esme Hacieminoglu. (2016). Does Outdoor Education Make any Difference in Environmental Literacy of Pre-service Classroom Teachers? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION, 11(15), 8491-8506. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-tests on pre-test Environmental Literacy Scale scores (Table 4; e.g., attitudes p=.492, uses p=.120, concern p=.165, knowledge p=.690), establishing baseline equivalence of the randomly selected groups. No effect sizes are printed.

"Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between pre -test scores of control and experimental groups with respect to environmental knowledge, environmental attitudes, environmental uses, and environmental concern."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.