Claims

Subgroup analysis for primary care physicians showed burnout improvements that did not differ from the overall observational results

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Subgroup analysis restricted to primary care physicians (two studies) found results that did not differ for any burnout subscale from the overall observational meta-analysis. → Venegas Carolina Lavin 2019

Evidence

Venegas Carolina Lavin 2019

Venegas Carolina Lavin, Nkangu Miriam N., Duffy Melissa C., Fergusson Dean A., Spilg Edward G. (2019). Interventions to improve resilience in physicians who have completed training: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210512

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Planned subgroup analysis by level of care. Only two studies (Winefield 1998; Krasner 2009) contributed; pooled estimates (e.g. EE SMD -0.58, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.25) were reported with I2 = 0% and did not differ from the overall results.

"Due to the small number of studies we were only able to conduct subgroup analysis for primary care physicians for burnout including only two studies [38,40] but results did not differ for any of the burnout subscales"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.