Presenting primary knowledge first and then secondary knowledge was more efficient in both performance and motivation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A priming phase with primary knowledge content before secondary-knowledge training improved final performance and motivation compared with the alternative ordering. → Florence Lespiau 2019
Evidence¶
Florence Lespiau 2019¶
Florence Lespiau, André Tricot. (2019). Using Primary Knowledge: an Efficient Way To Motivate Students and Promote the Learning of Formal Reasoning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09482-4
q3 · i? · causal · r?
In the third experiment, university students (n=227) completed a priming phase with primary or secondary knowledge problems, then a training phase of secondary knowledge only, then a final test. The article reports that "presenting primary knowledge first and then secondary knowledge was more efficient both in terms of performance and motivation"; no effect sizes are printed in the available text.
"Finally, presenting primary knowledge first and then secondary knowledge was more efficient both in terms of performance and motivation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Primary knowledge content favored learners' involvement and persistence in the training phase regardless of their personal characteristics, unlike secondary knowledge — related
- Framing formal logical problems in primary knowledge contexts makes learners more efficient, more motivated, more confident and lowers cognitive load compared with secondary knowledge framing — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Example-first conditions outperformed problem-first conditions on an immediate circuit test — related
- Example-based sequences outperform problem-only practice for novices, and fading support is argued to aid transfer — related
- Productive Failure Improves Conceptual Learning — reports the opposite
- Invention Tasks Prepare Future Learning — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
primary-first-sequencing-benefits |
title |
Presenting primary knowledge first and then secondary knowledge was more efficient in both performance and motivation |
description |
Presenting primary knowledge first and then secondary knowledge was more efficient in both performance and motivation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — florence-lespiau-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.