Learning biologically primary words is perceived as less difficult and less effortful than learning biologically secondary words¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Primary knowledge words were experienced with less difficulty (d = -0.96) and less effort (d = -0.78) than secondary knowledge words. → Kate M. Xu 2024

Evidence¶

Kate M. Xu 2024¶

Kate M. Xu, Sarah Coertjens, Florence Lespiau, Kim Ouwehand, Hanke Korpershoek, Fred Paas, David C. Geary. (2024). An Evolutionary Approach to Motivation and Learning: Differentiating Biologically Primary and Secondary Knowledge. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09880-3

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Paired-sample t-tests on nine-point cognitive-load ratings (Paas, 1992) after each list in the same experiment. Participants "experienced less difficulty" (d = -0.96) and "less effort" (d = -0.78) for primary words, both p < 0.001.

"experienced less difficulty (t = -11.48, p < 0.001, d = -0.96; M = 4.89, SD = 1.41 for primary knowledge words; M = 5.65, SD = 1.49 for secondary knowledge words) and less effort (t = -9.35, p < 0.001, d = -0.78"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Biologically primary motor actions such as finger tracing can provide cognitive benefits without causing cognitive load — related
• Invested mental effort and perceived task difficulty are strongly correlated yet relate differently to relative task difficulty, indicating the two ratings measure different aspects of overall cognitive load — related
• Adults recall more biologically primary knowledge words than biologically secondary knowledge words in a paired vocabulary learning task — related
• Learning biologically primary words is rated as more enjoyable and more interesting than learning biologically secondary words — related