Claims

Principals' professional development access is positively but not significantly related to teacher retention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The overall extent of principals' professional development and all its components show positive odds ratios for teacher retention (ranging from 0.99 to 1.04), but none reaches statistical significance. → Campoli 2022

Evidence

Campoli 2022

Campoli, A. K., & Darling-Hammond, L. (with Podolsky, A., & Levin, S.). (2022). Principal learning opportunities and school outcomes: Evidence from California. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/438.376

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Logistic regression of teacher retention on professional development factors (Table 3) in the full professional development sample, controlling for teacher, school, and district characteristics. Printed odds ratios range from 0.99 (managing change) to 1.04 (meeting needs of diverse learners), with no significance markers.

"The overall extent of principals' professional development, as well as all the components of professional development, also appear to be positively related to teacher retention; that is, the odds that a teacher will still be teaching in the same school the following year. However, none of the relationships reaches a level of statistical significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id principal-pd-teacher-retention-null
title Principals' professional development access is positively but not significantly related to teacher retention
description Principals' professional development access is positively but not significantly related to teacher retention
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — campoli-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.