Claims

Principals expressed somewhat greater concern about retention's negative effects than teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only two-thirds of principals agreed retention improves long-term chances of success, and 64 percent of principals versus 45 percent of teachers worried students begin to dislike school after being held back. → Jacob 2004

Evidence

Jacob 2004

Jacob, R. T., Stone, S., & Roderick, M. (2004). Ending Social Promotion: The Response of Teachers and Students. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/ending-social-promotion-response-teachers-and-students

q2 · i? · associational · r2

1999 CPS principal survey on retention attitudes, compared with teacher responses from the same survey. The report states "Only two-thirds of principals sur- veyed in 1999 agreed that reten- tion improves students’ long-term chances of success," lower than the teacher proportion.

"Sixty-four percent of principals versus 45 percent of teachers worried that “students begin to dislike school after be- ing held back.”"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id principals-more-concerned-about-retention
title Principals expressed somewhat greater concern about retention's negative effects than teachers
description Principals expressed somewhat greater concern about retention's negative effects than teachers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2004
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jacob-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.