Claims

Students with very different prior math achievement generate similar numbers of representations and solution methods during Productive Failure

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 In the variance unit, schools differing greatly in prior math achievement showed no significant difference in number of RSMs (d = 0.03). → Manu Kapur 2023 q3 i2 In the ratios unit, the higher-achieving school generated modestly more RSMs (d = 0.48), far less than its prior-achievement advantage (d = 2.12). → Manu Kapur 2023 (2)

Evidence

Manu Kapur 2023

Manu Kapur, Janan Saba and Ido Roll. (2023). Prior math achievement and inventive production predict learning from productive failure. npj Science of Learning 8:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00165-y

q3 · i0 · associational · r2

Quasi-experimental variance-unit study of eighth graders from two schools with significantly different PSLE profiles. ANOVA on group-level RSM counts found no significant school difference (d = 0.03), despite schools differing in prior achievement.

"An ANOVA did not reveal any significant difference between the two schools on the number of RSMs, for school A: M = 5.23, SD = 1.50, for school B: M = 5.19, SD = 1.49, F(1, 103) = 0.015, p = 0.903, d = 0.03."

Manu Kapur 2023 (2)

Manu Kapur, Janan Saba and Ido Roll. (2023). Prior math achievement and inventive production predict learning from productive failure. npj Science of Learning 8:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00165-y

q3 · i2 · associational · r2

Ratios-unit study of seventh graders: the higher-achieving school generated significantly more RSMs, d = 0.48. The discussion notes this was "less than a quarter of their pre-existing difference in their prior math achievement (d = 2.12)".

"An ANOVA revealed a significant difference between the two schools on the number of RSMs in ratio unit, for school A: M = 6.83, SD = 1.44, for school B: M = 6.16, SD = 1.38, F(1, 110) = 5.669, p = 0.019, d = 0.48."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.