Claims

Activating prior knowledge with Preview-and-Predict and K-W-L strategies raises English comprehension achievement in junior secondary students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After a six-week treatment, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the English comprehension post-test. → Olu Oyinloye 2013

Evidence

Olu Oyinloye 2013

Olu Oyinloye, Abiodun.A. Popoola. (2013). Activating Junior Secondary School Students' Prior Knowledge for the Development of Vocabulary, Concepts and Mathematics through Instructional Strategies. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.2p.1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group study of 260 junior secondary students in Ekiti State, Nigeria; experimental groups used Preview-and-Predict and K-W-L strategies for six weeks. Post-test means were 22.504 (experimental) versus 14.284 (control), with t-calculated "– 21.62" against a table value of 1.96, reported as a significant difference.

"Table 2 above shows that the t-calculated is – 21.62 while the table value is 1.96, therefore the t-calculated is greater than the table value the null hypothesis is retained at 0.05 level of significance. Therefore achievement of the students in the experimental group is significantly different from that of the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.