Problem analysis through small-group discussion particularly stimulates the production of explanatory propositions, via a significant treatment-by-proposition-type interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 1989 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Experiment 1, a significant interaction emerged between experimental manipulation and type of propositions produced, F(1, 37) = 19.27, p < .001, with the effect especially strong for explanatory statements. → Schmidt 1989
Evidence¶
Schmidt 1989¶
Schmidt, H. G., De Volder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory Models in the Processing of Science Text: The Role of Prior Knowledge Activation Through Small-Group Discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 610-619. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.81.4.610
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Two-way ANOVA of Experiment 1 free-recall protocols (condition between subjects, proposition type within subjects) showed the treatment affected both descriptive propositions, F(1, 37) = 12.32, p < .01, and explanations, F(1, 37) = 47.24, p < .001, with explanations showing the larger effect; the experimental group produced "more than three times as many" explanatory propositions.
"However, a significant interaction effect emerged between experimental manipulation and type of propositions produced, F(1, 37) = 19.27, MSe = 5.84, p < .001."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The text-recall benefit of problem analysis is confined to explanatory propositions; descriptive facts are not better remembered — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The recall benefit of prior problem-based discussion applies to both explanatory and descriptive propositions, with no interaction between treatment and proposition type — reports the opposite
- Problem-based tutorial discussion of a relevant problem before studying an expository text increases the number of accurate propositions recalled from that text — a broader claim this one bears on
- Problem-based discussion prior to studying a text does not increase the number of inferences during immediate free recall — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
problem-analysis-favors-explanatory-propositions |
title |
Problem analysis through small-group discussion particularly stimulates the production of explanatory propositions, via a significant treatment-by-proposition-type interaction |
description |
Problem analysis through small-group discussion particularly stimulates the production of explanatory propositions, via a significant treatment-by-proposition-type interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1989 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — schmidt-1989 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.