The process-based intervention significantly improved students' perceptions toward the writing process, while control-group perceptions stayed unchanged¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Experimental-group perceptions rose significantly from pre to post (M 3.78 to 4.12); control-group perceptions remained unchanged. → Ngo 2011
q2 i? The experimental group's post-level perceptions were significantly higher than the control group's. → Ngo 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Ngo 2011¶
Ngo, C. M. & Trinh, L. Q. (2011). Lagging Behind Writing Pedagogical Developments: The Impact of Implementing Process-Based Approach on Learners' Writing in a Vietnamese Secondary Education Context. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(3), July-September 2011. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071038
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Fifteen-item questionnaire on perceptions of pre-writing, drafting, peer-evaluating and revising, administered pre and post to both groups (reliability .75 and .83). The article reports a significant within-group change with no effect size.
"there is a significant change in participants' perceptions in the experimental condition (F (1, 26) = 9.803, p = .004); the post level (M post = 4.12) is higher than the initial level (M pre = 3.78)"
Ngo 2011 (2)¶
Ngo, C. M. & Trinh, L. Q. (2011). Lagging Behind Writing Pedagogical Developments: The Impact of Implementing Process-Based Approach on Learners' Writing in a Vietnamese Secondary Education Context. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(3), July-September 2011. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071038
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Between-group ANOVA on post-questionnaire scores; the article reports significance with the F statistic only, no effect size.
"The post level of participants' perceptions in the experimental condition is significantly higher than that in the control condition (F (1, 55) = 18.73, p = .00)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students' perceptions toward the writing process were not correlated with their writing performance in either condition — related
- A sixteen-week process-based writing intervention produced significantly higher writing performance than product-based instruction in Vietnamese grade-10 EFL classes — related
- Within the experimental group, achievement rose significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's gain was not statistically significant — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.