Claims

The process-based intervention significantly improved students' perceptions toward the writing process, while control-group perceptions stayed unchanged

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group perceptions rose significantly from pre to post (M 3.78 to 4.12); control-group perceptions remained unchanged. → Ngo 2011 q2 i? The experimental group's post-level perceptions were significantly higher than the control group's. → Ngo 2011 (2)

Evidence

Ngo 2011

Ngo, C. M. & Trinh, L. Q. (2011). Lagging Behind Writing Pedagogical Developments: The Impact of Implementing Process-Based Approach on Learners' Writing in a Vietnamese Secondary Education Context. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(3), July-September 2011. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071038

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Fifteen-item questionnaire on perceptions of pre-writing, drafting, peer-evaluating and revising, administered pre and post to both groups (reliability .75 and .83). The article reports a significant within-group change with no effect size.

"there is a significant change in participants' perceptions in the experimental condition (F (1, 26) = 9.803, p = .004); the post level (M post = 4.12) is higher than the initial level (M pre = 3.78)"

Ngo 2011 (2)

Ngo, C. M. & Trinh, L. Q. (2011). Lagging Behind Writing Pedagogical Developments: The Impact of Implementing Process-Based Approach on Learners' Writing in a Vietnamese Secondary Education Context. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(3), July-September 2011. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071038

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Between-group ANOVA on post-questionnaire scores; the article reports significance with the F statistic only, no effect size.

"The post level of participants' perceptions in the experimental condition is significantly higher than that in the control condition (F (1, 55) = 18.73, p = .00)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.