Claims

Both wiki-based and traditional pen-and-paper process-based writing instruction improve EFL writing achievement across all measured subskills.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Within-group pre-test to post-test comparisons showed significant improvement on content, organization, discourse markers, vocabulary, sentence construction, mechanics and total score for both the control and experimental groups. → Celik 2016

Evidence

Celik 2016

Celik, S.S. & Aydin, S. (2016). Wiki effect on English as a foreign language writing achievement. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(4), 218-227. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573959

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples tests within each group showed significant gains from pre-test to post-test on all seven writing dimensions (content, organization, discourse markers, vocabulary, sentence construction, mechanics, total score), with significance levels of .00 or .03 as reported in Tables 2 and 3.

"there were significant differences between the scores of pre -and post-test scores for the control group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.