Claims

Proctor notification when students disengage makes a significant impact on student test engagement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-09 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Notifying proctors when students disengage during testing has a significant impact on student test engagement. → Steven Wise 2019

Evidence

Steven Wise 2019

Steven Wise, Megan Kuhfeld, James Soland. (2019). The impact of proctor notification when students disengage. NWEA Research brief. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/the-impact-of-proctor-notification-when-students-disengage/

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The brief's own description of the research states that "New research on student test engagement shows how proctor notification can make a significant impact." No effect size, sample, or statistic is printed in the supplied text.

"New research on student test engagement shows how proctor notification can make a significant impact."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id proctor-notification-improves-test-engagement
title Proctor notification when students disengage makes a significant impact on student test engagement
description Proctor notification when students disengage makes a significant impact on student test engagement
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
source_checked 2026-10-09
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — steven-wise-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.