Professional commitment is essentially uncorrelated with AI literacy and shows no significant bivariate correlation with learning engagement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i0 Professional commitment showed no significant relationship with AI literacy (r = 0.001, p = 0.997) or learning engagement (r = 0.063, p = 0.063), despite its significant moderating role. → Wang 2026
Evidence¶
Wang 2026¶
Wang, N. (2026). The impact of artificial intelligence literacy on learning engagement among university students: the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of professional identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 17:1892204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1892204
q2 · i0 · associational · r2
Pearson correlation analysis (Table 1) among the four core constructs in the 1,198-student survey. The article found "no significant relationship between professional commitment and artificial intelligence literacy" or engagement, while AI literacy correlated with engagement (r = 0.57) and PsyCap with both (r = 0.68, r = 0.65).
"There was no significant relationship between professional commitment and artificial intelligence literacy (r = 0.001, p = 0.997) or learning engagement (r = 0.063, p = 0.063)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The indirect effect of AI literacy on engagement via psychological capital strengthens as professional commitment rises (moderated mediation) — related
- Professional commitment positively moderates the effect of psychological capital on learning engagement — related
- Learning engagement, PsyCap, and commitment differ by gender, student-leader status, and grade level — related
- Learning gains were uncorrelated with prior self-reported AI literacy and database literacy, suggesting AI integration benefited students irrespective of prior perceptions — related
- Students' self-reported perception of peer assessment's benefit is virtually uncorrelated with their actual measured benefit — related
- AI literacy directly and positively predicts learning engagement among university students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
professional-commitment-null-bivariate-correlations |
title |
Professional commitment is essentially uncorrelated with AI literacy and shows no significant bivariate correlation with learning engagement |
description |
Professional commitment is essentially uncorrelated with AI literacy and shows no significant bivariate correlation with learning engagement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wang-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.