Teacher candidates' projected future classroom technology use mirrors their student-teaching use, with most describing routine, non-transformative use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Responses about intended future use showed the same frequency and nature-of-use themes as student-teaching responses, and the majority of respondents wrote about using or expecting to use technology in routine, non-transformative ways. → Buss 2017
Evidence¶
Buss 2017¶
Buss, R. R., Lindsey, L., Foulger, T. S., Wetzel, K., & Pasquel, S. (2017). Assessing a technology infusion approach in a teacher preparation program. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 33-44. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Assessing+a+technology+infusion+approach+in+a+teacher+preparation+program
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses to how candidates hope to use technology-infused instruction in their own classrooms next year. The article reports results "are remarkably similar" to student-teaching use, with teacher-directed delivery, routine effective use, higher-level use, and continued interactive whiteboard use all represented.
"the majority of respondents wrote about using technology and expecting to use technology in routine, non-transformative ways. Still others claimed they used and intended to use technology in more transformative fashion, albeit the number of these TCs was much smaller."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- During student teaching, teacher candidates' technology integration varied in frequency and fell into four categories of use: teacher use, effective-but-not-transformative student use, higher-level student use, and interactive whiteboard use — related
- Teacher candidates' advice for improving technology-infused courses clustered into three themes: better instruction and instructors, more tools and practice, and focus on school-available technology — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
projected-future-tech-use-mirrors-student-teaching |
title |
Teacher candidates' projected future classroom technology use mirrors their student-teaching use, with most describing routine, non-transformative use |
description |
Teacher candidates' projected future classroom technology use mirrors their student-teaching use, with most describing routine, non-transformative use |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — buss-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.