Prompt requirements differ between scenario-protocols, with the height-planning protocol (C) requiring the most prompts¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 The mean number of prompts provided differed significantly between scenario-protocols A-F (partial η² = .74). → Bosma et al. 2017 q3 i? Scenario C (planning height) required significantly more prompts than the other five scenario-protocols (p ≤ .001). → Bosma et al. 2017

Evidence¶

Bosma et al. 2017¶

Tirza Bosma, Claire E. Stevenson, Wilma C. M. Resing. (2017). Differences in Need for Instruction: Dynamic Testing in Children with Arithmetic Difficulties. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, No. 6. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i6.2326

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Repeated measures analysis of prompts per scenario-protocol in the trained group (N = 60). The main effect was significant with printed effect size partial η² = .74; follow-up contrasts showed "The most prompts were required in scenario C (p ≤ .001) compared to the other 5 scenario-protocols" (mean 17.75).

"A significant main effect for scenario-protocols was found F (5,55) = 30.86, p < .001, partial η² = .74, indicating that, as expected (2b) the mean number of prompts provided differed between scenario-protocols."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cluster analysis of prompts per scenario-protocol distinguishes four profiles of instructional need: General, Measuring, Accuracy and Organizing — related
• The number of prompts children need decreases across the series of training problems — related
• Prompt requirements for each scenario-protocol change differently over the series of problems — related