Claims

The design strained on later proof-heavy topics, and students asked for better artifacts rather than fewer tests

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Free-text complaints concentrated on reductions, NP-completeness, PSPACE, and an overloaded week, described as too terse. → Jin-Guo Liu 2026 q2 i? Only 4 of 18 students selected fewer tests as a top improvement; 11 of 18 wanted more worked examples and 11 a practice-problem bank. → Jin-Guo Liu 2026 (2)

Evidence

Jin-Guo Liu 2026

Jin-Guo Liu, Shang-Qi Lu, Xin-Ran Shi, Long-Li Zheng, Wei Wang. (2026). Test-Driven, AI-Assisted Learning: Replacing Lectures with Weekly Closed-Book Tests. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23315 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.23315

q2 · i? · design · r2

Free-text survey comments from the end-of-term survey (N=18), analyzed qualitatively. Complaints "concentrate on later proof-heavy topics"; the authors link this to cognitive-load and proof-scaffolding work. No effect sizes printed.

"Free-text complaints concentrate on later proof-heavy topics: reductions, NP-completeness, PSPACE, and an overloaded week. Students described these as "too terse" and asked for more figures and examples,"

Jin-Guo Liu 2026 (2)

Jin-Guo Liu, Shang-Qi Lu, Xin-Ran Shi, Long-Li Zheng, Wei Wang. (2026). Test-Driven, AI-Assisted Learning: Replacing Lectures with Weekly Closed-Book Tests. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23315

q2 · i? · design · r2

Improvement-ranking items from the same survey (N=18). "11 of 18 for more worked examples" and 11 for a practice-problem bank; the authors conclude the next iteration should improve artifacts before weakening the weekly gate.

"Only 4 of 18 selected fewer tests as a top improvement. The strongest signals were 11 of 18 for more worked examples, 11 for a practice-problem bank, 9 for an AI-workflow guide, and 7 for short videos."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id proof-heavy-topics-strained-artifacts-requested
title The design strained on later proof-heavy topics, and students asked for better artifacts rather than fewer tests
description The design strained on later proof-heavy topics, and students asked for better artifacts rather than fewer tests
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — jin-guo-liu-2026, jin-guo-liu-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.