Propensity to gesture and verbal memory positively predicted free recall, and the two were uncorrelated (Study 2)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Study 2 free recall, propensity to gesture and verbal memory each had significant positive main effects. → Thakore 2024
q3 i0 Propensity to gesture and verbal memory were not significantly correlated, r(96) = −0.02. → Thakore 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Thakore 2024¶
Thakore, K., Das, T., Jahan, S., & Sweller, N. (2024). From Hands to Mind: How Gesture, Emotional Valence, and Individual Differences Impact Narrative Recall. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09948-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Study 2 free recall mixed model (N = 98) showed "significant positive main effects of propensity to gesture" and VM; only unstandardised coefficients with CIs are printed, so no standardised effect size is reported.
"there were significant positive main effects of propensity to gesture (M = 13.58, SD = 8.10), z = 3.09, p = 0.002, 95% CI [0.03, 0.12], and VM (M = 10.53, SD = 3.13), z = 3.66, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.11, 0.37]."
Thakore 2024 (2)¶
Thakore, K., Das, T., Jahan, S., & Sweller, N. (2024). From Hands to Mind: How Gesture, Emotional Valence, and Individual Differences Impact Narrative Recall. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09948-0
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
Pearson's correlation in Study 2 between measured propensity to gesture (gesture rate per 100 words during cartoon retelling) and RAVLT immediate verbal memory: "no significant correlation between these variables, r(96) = − 0.02" — a negligible printed effect size.
"There was no significant correlation between these variables, r(96) = − 0.02, p = 0.83."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Gesture instructions hindered specific recall for participants with lower propensity to gesture (Study 2) — related
- Instructing adults to gesture while reading narratives aloud hindered free recall relative to spontaneous gesturing (Study 1) — related
- Gesture instructions impaired narrative recall only for participants with average or above-average verbal memory, not those below average (Study 1) — related
- Gesture effects on narrative comprehension are not moderated by total task difficulty or age when measured through free recall and specific questions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
propensity-gesture-verbal-memory-predict-recall |
title |
Propensity to gesture and verbal memory positively predicted free recall, and the two were uncorrelated (Study 2) |
description |
Propensity to gesture and verbal memory positively predicted free recall, and the two were uncorrelated (Study 2) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — thakore-2024, thakore-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.