Claims

Propensity to gesture and verbal memory positively predicted free recall, and the two were uncorrelated (Study 2)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In Study 2 free recall, propensity to gesture and verbal memory each had significant positive main effects. → Thakore 2024 q3 i0 Propensity to gesture and verbal memory were not significantly correlated, r(96) = −0.02. → Thakore 2024 (2)

Evidence

Thakore 2024

Thakore, K., Das, T., Jahan, S., & Sweller, N. (2024). From Hands to Mind: How Gesture, Emotional Valence, and Individual Differences Impact Narrative Recall. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09948-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Study 2 free recall mixed model (N = 98) showed "significant positive main effects of propensity to gesture" and VM; only unstandardised coefficients with CIs are printed, so no standardised effect size is reported.

"there were significant positive main effects of propensity to gesture (M = 13.58, SD = 8.10), z = 3.09, p = 0.002, 95% CI [0.03, 0.12], and VM (M = 10.53, SD = 3.13), z = 3.66, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.11, 0.37]."

Thakore 2024 (2)

Thakore, K., Das, T., Jahan, S., & Sweller, N. (2024). From Hands to Mind: How Gesture, Emotional Valence, and Individual Differences Impact Narrative Recall. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09948-0

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Pearson's correlation in Study 2 between measured propensity to gesture (gesture rate per 100 words during cartoon retelling) and RAVLT immediate verbal memory: "no significant correlation between these variables, r(96) = − 0.02" — a negligible printed effect size.

"There was no significant correlation between these variables, r(96) = − 0.02, p = 0.83."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id propensity-gesture-verbal-memory-predict-recall
title Propensity to gesture and verbal memory positively predicted free recall, and the two were uncorrelated (Study 2)
description Propensity to gesture and verbal memory positively predicted free recall, and the two were uncorrelated (Study 2)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — thakore-2024, thakore-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.