Higher (worse) prospective discrepancy scores predict higher metacognitive sensitivity on a memory task¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In a multiple regression predicting AUROC2, higher prospective discrepancy scores were a significant positive predictor (β = 0.233, p = .014). → Terneusen 2024

Evidence¶

Terneusen 2024¶

Terneusen, A., Quaedflieg, C., van Heugten, C., Ponds, R., & Winkens, I. (2024). The many facets of metacognition: comparing multiple measures of metacognition in healthy individuals. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09350-1

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Multiple regression analysis in a study of 128 healthy volunteers predicting metacognitive sensitivity (AUROC2) on a word-pair memory task. The article reports "higher prospective discrepancy scores (β = 0.233, p = .014)" as a significant predictor; no standardized effect size beyond the beta is printed.

"Significant predictors were higher prospective discrepancy scores (β = 0.233, p = .014) and lower retrospective discrepancy scores (β=-0.185, p = .038)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Lower (better) retrospective discrepancy scores predict higher metacognitive sensitivity on a memory task — related
• Eliciting confidence ratings leads to poorer metacognitive monitoring in older adults — related