Claims

PS-ASD participants acquired community-based competitive employment at far higher rates than high-school-services-as-usual controls (90.3% vs 5.9% at 3 months; 87.1% vs 11.1% at 12 months)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The treatment group was significantly more likely to be employed than the control group across all four time points (GEE χ²(1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001). → Wehman P 2017

Evidence

Wehman P 2017

Wehman P, Schall CM, McDonough J, Graham C, Brooke V, Riehle JE, Brooke A, Ham W, Lau S, Allen J, Avellone L. (2017). Effects of an employer-based intervention on employment outcomes for youth with significant support needs due to autism. Autism 21(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316635826

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Randomized clinical trial of 49 youth with ASD (31 treatment, 18 control) comparing PS-ASD with high school special education services as usual; repeated dichotomous employment status analyzed with GEE. Treatment employment reached "74.2% at graduation, 90.3% at 3-month follow-up" and 87.1% at 12 months, versus 5.9% and 11.1% for controls.

"The GEE model of employment status (employed vs unemployed) was significant and indicated that the treatment group was significantly more likely to be employed than the control group (x2(1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.