PS-ASD participants acquired community-based competitive employment at far higher rates than high-school-services-as-usual controls (90.3% vs 5.9% at 3 months; 87.1% vs 11.1% at 12 months)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The treatment group was significantly more likely to be employed than the control group across all four time points (GEE χ²(1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001). → Wehman P 2017
Evidence¶
Wehman P 2017¶
Wehman P, Schall CM, McDonough J, Graham C, Brooke V, Riehle JE, Brooke A, Ham W, Lau S, Allen J, Avellone L. (2017). Effects of an employer-based intervention on employment outcomes for youth with significant support needs due to autism. Autism 21(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316635826
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Randomized clinical trial of 49 youth with ASD (31 treatment, 18 control) comparing PS-ASD with high school special education services as usual; repeated dichotomous employment status analyzed with GEE. Treatment employment reached "74.2% at graduation, 90.3% at 3-month follow-up" and 87.1% at 12 months, versus 5.9% and 11.1% for controls.
"The GEE model of employment status (employed vs unemployed) was significant and indicated that the treatment group was significantly more likely to be employed than the control group (x2(1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Weekly hours worked rose significantly for employed PS-ASD participants from graduation to 12-month follow-up (d = 2.17), while control hours did not change — related
- PS-ASD participants earned substantially higher wages than controls, but the wage difference was not significant when unemployed participants were excluded — related
- Way2Work Maryland did not affect postsecondary education and training outcomes, but more treatment group members completed high school within two years of enrollment — related
- Control group members had ready access to transition-related services, and Way2Work services may have substituted for existing services — related
- Way2Work Maryland did not affect employment or expectation outcomes as of 24 months after enrollment — related
- Employment support intensity needs decreased significantly over 21 months for the treatment group while remaining unchanged for controls, but not when unemployed participants were excluded — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.