Claims

OSCEs used with physical therapy students show weak internal consistency, with a pooled Cronbach's alpha of 0.55 below the acceptable range

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The pooled Cronbach's alpha between OSCE station scores was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.67), considered moderate and slightly below the acceptable range. → Bobos Pavlos 2021 q3 i? Heterogeneity in alpha estimates was explained by the field of the OSCE (e.g., musculoskeletal), with a significant meta-regression coefficient. → Bobos Pavlos 2021 (2)

Evidence

Bobos Pavlos 2021

Bobos Pavlos, Pouliopoulou Dimitra V., Harriss Alexandra, Sadi Jackie, Rushton Alison, MacDermid Joy C. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of objective structured clinical examinations used in physical therapy licensure and a structured review of licensure practices in countries with well-developed regulation systems. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255696

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Random effects meta-analysis of four included studies reporting Cronbach's alpha for OSCE station scores in physical therapy students. The pooled estimate was "0.55, (95% CI: 0.41, 0.67)" with moderate heterogeneity I2 = 65.5%. No standardised effect size was printed for this finding.

"Based on the available data, we found a pooled estimate of Cronbach’s alpha between OSCE station scores of 0.55, (95% CI: 0.41, 0.67) with moderate statistical heterogeneity, I2 = 65.5% (Fig 2)."

Bobos Pavlos 2021 (2)

Bobos Pavlos, Pouliopoulou Dimitra V., Harriss Alexandra, Sadi Jackie, Rushton Alison, MacDermid Joy C. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of objective structured clinical examinations used in physical therapy licensure and a structured review of licensure practices in countries with well-developed regulation systems. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255696

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Univariate meta-regression investigating sources of the moderate heterogeneity in alpha estimates. The field of OSCE was "statistically significant p<0.0001" with R2 = 97.85% of between-study variance explained. No standardised effect size was printed.

"The regression coefficient for the field of OSCE was statistically significant p<0.0001, (0.25, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.39) with 98% of between-study variance explained (R2 = 97.85%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.