Claims

RAE effect size increases linearly with relative age differences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across the meta-analyzed samples, RAE magnitude increased linearly as relative age differences between athletes grew. → Cobley 2009

Evidence

Cobley 2009

Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., McKenna, J. (2009). Annual Age-Grouping and Athlete Development. Sports Med 39, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Follow-up analysis of the pooled odds-ratio estimates from the 253 independent samples reported that "Effect size increased linearly with relative age differences." No coefficient or effect-size value for the trend is printed in the available text.

"Overall results identified consistent prevalence of RAEs, but with small effect sizes. Effect size increased linearly with relative age differences."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rae-effect-size-increases-with-relative-age-difference
title RAE effect size increases linearly with relative age differences
description RAE effect size increases linearly with relative age differences
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — cobley-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.