Claims

RALL studies raise general issues regarding students' motivation in robot-assisted learning situations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Beyond learning gains, the RALL studies reviewed raise general issues concerning students' motivation in learning situations with robots. → van den Berghe 2019

Evidence

van den Berghe 2019

van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., van der Ven, S., & Leseman, P. (2019). Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 259-295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318821286

q2 · i? · review · r?

The review reports that the corpus of RALL studies raises "more general issues regarding students’ motivation" in learning situations. This is the review's own framing of the literature; no specific motivational effect size is printed.

"these studies raise more general issues regarding students’ motivation and robots’ social behavior in learning situations"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rall-student-motivation-issues
title RALL studies raise general issues regarding students' motivation in robot-assisted learning situations
description RALL studies raise general issues regarding students' motivation in robot-assisted learning situations
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
recheck_by 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-den-berghe-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.