Claims

Rapid-guessing behavior is consistently very low across demographic subpopulations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The amount of rapid-guessing behavior was consistently very low among various demographic subpopulations. → Steven Wise 2013

Evidence

Steven Wise 2013

Steven Wise, J. Carl Setzer, Jill R. van den Heuvel, Guangming Ling. (2013). An investigation of examinee test-taking effort on a large-scale assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(1), 34–49. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/an-investigation-of-examinee-test-taking-effort-on-a-large-scale-assessment/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Subpopulation analyses of the low-stakes instrument found rapid guessing "consistently very low among various demographic subpopulations," indicating no subgroup showed elevated disengagement.

"The amount of rapid-guessing behavior was consistently very low among various demographic subpopulations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rapid-guessing-low-across-demographic-subpopulations
title Rapid-guessing behavior is consistently very low across demographic subpopulations
description Rapid-guessing behavior is consistently very low across demographic subpopulations
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — steven-wise-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.