Claims

Two randomized trials of dVSS or dV-Trainer training to proficiency found no significant differences between trained and control groups on operative performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the Vargas RCT (38 medical students) and the Whitehurst RCT (20 trainees), no significant differences were found between the VR-trained intervention and control groups on GEARS operative performance or operating time. → Schmidt MW 2021

Evidence

Schmidt MW 2021

Schmidt MW, Köppinger KF, Fan C, Kowalewski K-F, Schmidt LP, Vey J, Proctor T, Probst P, Bintintan VV, Müller-Stich B-P, Nickel F. (2021). Virtual reality simulation in robot-assisted surgery: meta-analysis of skill transfer and predictability of skill. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa066

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Whitehurst RCT (Table 3) comparing 20 gynaecology and urology trainees trained to proficiency on the dV-Trainer against a control group trained on the real robotic system, assessed on robotic cystostomy closure in live animal models. The article reports "No significant differences between IG and CG on operative performance"; equivalence was not tested.

"No significant differences between IG and CG on operative performance, which indicates skill transfer in this design"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.