Majorities of teachers and evaluators question the effort required by REACH, saying it takes more effort than the results are worth¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Almost 60 percent of teachers and 45 percent of evaluators agreed the evaluation process takes more effort than the results are worth. → Jiang 2014
Evidence¶
Jiang 2014¶
Jiang, J. (2014). Teacher Evaluation in Practice: Year Two Teacher and Administrator Perceptions of REACH. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/teacher-evaluation-practice-year-2-teacher-and-administrator-perceptions-reach
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Survey of teachers and evaluators (principals and assistant principals) in the year-two REACH brief. "Almost 60 percent of teachers and 45 percent of evaluators" agreed the process takes more effort than the results are worth; percentages are descriptive with no effect size.
"both teachers and evaluators questioned the effort required by the process, with almost 60 percent of teachers and 45 percent of evaluators agreeing that the evaluation process takes more effort than the results are worth"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both teachers and administrators report REACH increased their levels of stress and anxiety — related
- Teacher and administrator perceptions of REACH changed little between Year 2 and Year 3 of implementation — related
- Teachers and principals remain optimistic about REACH in year two, but teacher satisfaction with the evaluation process declined from year one — related
- Most teachers believe their REACH evaluation relies too heavily on student growth and question the fairness of the growth assessments — related
- Teachers and principals report REACH is changing teaching practice and improving communication and collaboration — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reach-effort-questioned-more-effort-than-results-worth |
title |
Majorities of teachers and evaluators question the effort required by REACH, saying it takes more effort than the results are worth |
description |
Majorities of teachers and evaluators question the effort required by REACH, saying it takes more effort than the results are worth |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jiang-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.