Reactivation-induced learners show superior practice efficiency (improvement per practice minute) relative to standard practice learners¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Subjects exhibiting reactivation-induced learning had a higher rate of improvement per practice time than Standard Practice subjects who showed learning. → Gilad Schrift 2022

Evidence¶

Gilad Schrift 2022¶

Gilad Schrift, Dror Dotan and Nitzan Censor. (2022). Brief memory reactivations induce learning in the numeric domain. npj Science of Learning 7:18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00136-9

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 1 one-way ANOVA on practice efficiency, defined as improvement between baseline and retest divided by practice time in minutes, comparing n = 21 reactivation learners with n = 29 standard practice learners; F 1,48 = 22.73, P = 0.00002. No standardized effect size is printed.

"subjects who exhibited reactivation-induced learning (n = 21) were characterized by superior ef ficiency relative to the standard group subjects who showed learning (n = 29; F 1,48 = 22.73, P = 0.00002)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Brief passive reactivations induce significant learning gains in numeric fact recall at retest 8 days after encoding — related