Claims

Reading comprehension correlates 0.40 with spelling, 0.24 with arithmetic, and 0.10 with writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Correlations of comprehension with single school subjects are low: spelling 0.40, arithmetic 0.24, writing 0.10; rate shows similar values. → Arthur I. Gates 1921

Evidence

Arthur I. Gates 1921

Arthur I. Gates. (1921). An Experimental and Statistical Study of Reading and Reading tests (Concluded). The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0064253

q2 · i? · associational · r1

From Tables XVIII and XIX correlations across grades III-VIII, the article reports reading's correlations with single subject composites are low, while the composite of school achievement correlates about 0.70, largely because reading is included in it.

"Correlations of comprehension with spelling average 0.40, with arithmetic 0.24, with writing 0.10. The correlations of these subjects with rate are about the same."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reading-school-subject-correlations-low
title Reading comprehension correlates 0.40 with spelling, 0.24 with arithmetic, and 0.10 with writing
description Reading comprehension correlates 0.40 with spelling, 0.24 with arithmetic, and 0.10 with writing
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1921
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — arthur-i-gates-1921

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.