Claims

Teachers who tried ReadWorks features reported high intent to assign more and higher-level articles (89% and 82%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of respondents who had tried at least one feature, 89 percent said they are likely to assign more articles and 82 percent said they are likely to assign higher-level articles as a result of the available features. → Tare 2019

Evidence

Tare 2019

Tare, M. & Shell, A. R. (2019). Designing for learner variability: Examining the impact of research-based edtech in the classroom. Washington, DC: Digital Promise Global. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/82839c44-adb1-400c-b422-9bfbbca65985 doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/81

q2 · i? · design · r2

Two overarching survey questions about the feature suite, asked of national survey respondents who had tried at least one feature. The report interprets these percentages as suggesting "the features may encourage teachers to challenge students and maintain high expectations for their performance."

"Of the respondents who had tried at least one of the features on our survey, 89 percent responded that they are likely to assign more articles on ReadWorks and 82 percent said that they are likely to assign higher-level articles on ReadWorks as a result of the features available to aid students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id readworks-features-raise-teacher-assignment-ambitions
title Teachers who tried ReadWorks features reported high intent to assign more and higher-level articles (89% and 82%)
description Teachers who tried ReadWorks features reported high intent to assign more and higher-level articles (89% and 82%)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tare-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.