Claims

Recalibrated 5Essentials measures based on 2014–19 data maintained acceptable Rasch reliability and school-level variance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All recalibrated measures showed acceptable Rasch reliability, with the majority above 0.80. → Hart 2020 q2 i? All measures explained sufficient school-level variance (ICC >0.05) to differentiate schools. → Hart 2020 (2)

Evidence

Hart 2020

Hart, H., Young, C., Chen, A., Zou, A., & Allensworth, E.M. (2020). Supporting school improvement: Early findings from reexamination of the 5Essentials survey. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/supporting-school-improvement

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Psychometric recalibration recreating all measures from recent data (2014–19) to check whether they maintained expected reliability and could still differentiate schools, since some original item parameters were created as long as 25 years ago.

"We found each of the measures had acceptable Rasch reliability, with the majority able to differentiate several strata of respondents (>0.80)."

Hart 2020 (2)

Hart, H., Young, C., Chen, A., Zou, A., & Allensworth, E.M. (2020). Supporting school improvement: Early findings from reexamination of the 5Essentials survey. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/supporting-school-improvement

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Intraclass correlation analysis of the recalibrated measures, checking school-level variance. All measures exceeded the ICC 0.05 threshold the report sets for usefulness in differentiating schools.

"We also calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for schools and found that all of the measures explained sufficient variance at the school level to be useful in differentiating schools (ICC >0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id recalibrated-5essentials-measures-reliability
title Recalibrated 5Essentials measures based on 2014–19 data maintained acceptable Rasch reliability and school-level variance
description Recalibrated 5Essentials measures based on 2014–19 data maintained acceptable Rasch reliability and school-level variance
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
recheck_by 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hart-2020, hart-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.