Uniform (redundant) contexts yield higher semantic similarity ratings than diverse contexts¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Items trained on low-variability paragraphs were rated as significantly more similar to their target associates than items trained across diverse contexts. → Johns 2016
Evidence¶
Johns 2016¶
Johns, B. T., Dye, M., & Jones, M. N. (2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0980-7
q3 · i? · causal · r2
In the semantic similarity judgment task following the PLDT, each of ten studied pseudowords was paired with four close associates (40 ratings total). "subjects rated items trained on the low variability paragraphs as significantly more similar to their target associates"; no effect size printed.
"subjects rated items trained on the low variability paragraphs as significantly more similar to their target associates [t(86) = 3.406, p = 0.001] (Fig. 5)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Words higher in contextual diversity and semantic richness are processed more accurately and efficiently in lexical tasks — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Words encountered in diverse contexts are recognized more accurately in a pseudolexical decision task — related
- Diverse and uniform training contexts dissociate: processing ease and semantic representation diverge early in learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Random shot selection yields the worst originality-similarity combination, while greedy and constraint-satisfaction selection raise originality without increasing item redundancy — related
- High-variability passages receive longer study times than low-variability passages
- Comprehension ratings diverge across training conditions over repeated passages, with a significant condition-by-trial interaction — related
- Words encountered in diverse contexts are identified faster, with a mean 26-ms advantage — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
redundant-contexts-improve-semantic-representations |
title |
Uniform (redundant) contexts yield higher semantic similarity ratings than diverse contexts |
description |
Uniform (redundant) contexts yield higher semantic similarity ratings than diverse contexts |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — johns-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.