Claims

Uniform (redundant) contexts yield higher semantic similarity ratings than diverse contexts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Items trained on low-variability paragraphs were rated as significantly more similar to their target associates than items trained across diverse contexts. → Johns 2016

Evidence

Johns 2016

Johns, B. T., Dye, M., & Jones, M. N. (2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0980-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the semantic similarity judgment task following the PLDT, each of ten studied pseudowords was paired with four close associates (40 ratings total). "subjects rated items trained on the low variability paragraphs as significantly more similar to their target associates"; no effect size printed.

"subjects rated items trained on the low variability paragraphs as significantly more similar to their target associates [t(86) = 3.406, p = 0.001] (Fig. 5)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id redundant-contexts-improve-semantic-representations
title Uniform (redundant) contexts yield higher semantic similarity ratings than diverse contexts
description Uniform (redundant) contexts yield higher semantic similarity ratings than diverse contexts
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — johns-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.