Posttests were coded as delayed if they occurred at least one day after treatment, with two-delay studies and studies lacking day/week delay metrics excluded from mean and median delay calculations¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Delayed posttests were defined as occurring at least one day after treatment. → Allison Zengilowski 2020
Evidence¶
Allison Zengilowski 2020¶
Allison Zengilowski, Brendan Schuetze, Brady Nash, Diane Schallert. (2020). Coding Notes for “A Critical Review of the Refutation Text Literature: Methodological Confounds, Theoretical Problems, and Possible Solutions”. Version 2. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22A+Critical+Review+of+the+Refutation+Text+Literature%22
q1 · i? · review · r?
The authors state their operational definition for the review's delay coding: posttests were "considered delayed if they occurred at least one day after the treatment".
"Posttests were considered delayed if they occurred at least one day after the treatment."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Corrective feedback on second-language errors has a significant effect on L2 development that is maintained on delayed tests — related
- In the review's coding, equal total and per-condition sample sizes signalled either a correlational study or a repeated-measures experiment, and repeated measures were coded when a pretest entered analysis or a within-subjects design was used
- Coding in the review was non-exclusive, and data from multiple experiments within one paper were separated by semicolons and averaged before computing corpus-level means and medians
- The review's corpus excluded studies that used refutation texts as stimuli but manipulated other variables so the primary purpose was not elucidating refutation-text effects, mechanisms, or moderators
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
refutation-text-delayed-posttest-coding-rule |
title |
Posttests were coded as delayed if they occurred at least one day after treatment, with two-delay studies and studies lacking day/week delay metrics excluded from mean and median delay calculations |
description |
Posttests were coded as delayed if they occurred at least one day after treatment, with two-delay studies and studies lacking day/week delay metrics excluded from mean and median delay calculations |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — allison-zengilowski-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.