Registered learners perform more actions and spend more time per Codeboard working session than anonymous learners¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Registered learners performed 6.35 actions per session on average versus 4.57 for anonymous learners (t=-3.78, p=0.0001). → Gallego-Romero 2020
q2 i? Registered learners spent 250.88 seconds per session on average versus 148.58 seconds for anonymous learners (t=-3.95, p<0.0001). → Gallego-Romero 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Gallego-Romero 2020¶
Gallego-Romero, J.M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I. et al. (2020). Analyzing learners' engagement and behavior in MOOCs on programming with the Codeboard IDE. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 2505–2528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09773-6
q2 · i? · associational · r1
t-test over 1,036 work sessions (820 anonymous, 216 registered) from Codeboard activity logs in three Java MOOCs, with normality and Levene's variance checks. The article reports means of 6.35 vs 4.57 actions per session, t=-3.78, p=0.0001 (Table 3).
"Interestingly, registered learners performed 6.35 actions per session on average, while anonymous learners performed only 4.57 actions, with a significant difference."
Gallego-Romero 2020 (2)¶
Gallego-Romero, J.M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I. et al. (2020). Analyzing learners' engagement and behavior in MOOCs on programming with the Codeboard IDE. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 2505–2528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09773-6
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Same session-level t-test analysis of Codeboard logs. The article reports mean session time of 250.88 seconds for registered versus 148.58 seconds for anonymous learners, t=-3.95, p<0.0001 (Table 3).
"The data collected also shows that registered learners spent more time per session than anonymous learners: 250.88 seconds for registered learners versus 148.58 seconds for anonymous learners, also with a significant difference."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- When comparing only sessions in which the base code was actually modified, there are no significant differences between anonymous and registered learners in actions or time per session — related
- Registered learners have a higher ratio of compilation errors to total compilations, consistent with deeper code modification — related
- Registered learners modify the teacher-provided base code more than anonymous learners, both in share of sessions and in Levenshtein distance — related
- Registered learners in programming MOOCs using Codeboard show greater engagement than anonymous learners, compiling and executing code more times per access — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
registered-learners-longer-sessions |
title |
Registered learners perform more actions and spend more time per Codeboard working session than anonymous learners |
description |
Registered learners perform more actions and spend more time per Codeboard working session than anonymous learners |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — gallego-romero-2020, gallego-romero-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.