Claims

Regular twice-weekly 40-minute physical education alone lacked sufficient intensity to enhance cardiovascular endurance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors interpret the control groups' lack of improvement as showing that standard Malaysian PE meets duration and frequency requirements but not the intensity needed to improve cardiovascular endurance. → Rengasamy et al. 2011

Evidence

Rengasamy et al. 2011

Shabeshan Rengasamy, Subramaniam Raju, Wee Akina Sia Seng Lee, Ramachandran Roa. (2011). A Fitness Intervention Program within a Physical Education Class on Cardiovascular Endurance among Malaysia Secondary School Students. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 2(1). http://www.moj-es.net

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation (type e) of the control groups' results in the discussion; no effect size is printed for the control groups' change, so the claim is an untested author interpretation.

"This may have fulfilled the minimum duration and the frequency levels required, but lack the sufficient intensity level to accomplish the total training volume to enhance cardiovascular endurance as shown by the control group of boys and girls."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.