Rehearsal significantly optimises retention of basic science knowledge among medical practitioners¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The review's synthesis found that rehearsals significantly optimise retention of basic science knowledge among medical practitioners. → Albert Francis A. 2024

Evidence¶

Albert Francis A. 2024¶

Albert Francis A., Seidu Abdul-Aziz, Mason Hannah M., Anderson Emma, Alele Faith O., Heggarty Paula, Hollins Aaron, Gupta Tarun Sen, Hays Richard B., McArthur Lawrie, Malau-Aduli Bunmi S. (2024). A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of 10 studies (QuADS-appraised) on basic science retention among medical doctors; the review's own synthesis states that "rehearsals significantly optimise the retention of basic science knowledge". No effect size is printed.

"The findings revealed that rehearsals significantly optimise the retention of basic science knowledge among medical practitioners."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it

Page metadata

Field	Value
`status`	`review`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-10-31`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.