Claims

Most remote courses used both synchronous and asynchronous delivery mechanisms

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 67% of surveyed students reported live synchronous sessions in their remote course, 65% reported instructor-recorded lectures, and 55% reported pre-recorded videos not of the instructor, indicating many courses combined delivery modes. → Means 2021

Evidence

Means 2021

Means, B., Peters, V., Neisler, J., Wiley, K., & Grifths, R. (2021). Lessons from remote learning during COVID-19. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/116

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Table 1 of the national student survey (n = 1,008) reports delivery mechanisms: "Live sessions (synchronous instruction) 67%", recorded lectures 65%, pre-recorded videos 55%. The report notes these percentages would be mathematically impossible if many courses did not include both synchronous and asynchronous delivery.

"Live sessions (synchronous instruction) 67% Recorded lectures by the instructor (asynchronous) 65% Pre-recorded videos, not of instructor 55%"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id remote-courses-mixed-synchronous-asynchronous-delivery
title Most remote courses used both synchronous and asynchronous delivery mechanisms
description Most remote courses used both synchronous and asynchronous delivery mechanisms
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — means-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.